Subject: [IPP] [PWG5100.16] Issue #73: Section 3.1: "1. Use existing the existing specfications..." should be "1. Use existing specifications..."

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:13:40 +0000 (UTC)

[Issue Unconfirmed]

Section 3.1 says:

3.1 Rationale for IPP Transaction-Based Printing Extensions
Given the following existing specifications and the need for a standard
method 
supporting Transaction-Based Printing without vendor-specific driver
software, the IP
Transaction-Based Printing Extensions specification should:
1. Use existing the existing IPP specfications to support job submission to
and monitoring of Paid Imaging Services...

Item #1 should rather read:

"1. Use existing IPP specifications"

to remove the redundant "existing" and fix the spelling of
"specifications".

Link: http://www.pwg.org/issues/73

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp