Subject: Re: [ippm] (no subject)

From: "Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:03:12 +0000

Hi IPPM WG,

I support the adoption of these documents.

Thanks,
Mike.

From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=[email-masked]>
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 3:35 PM
To: IETF IPPM WG ([email-masked]) <[email-masked]>
Cc: IPPM Chairs <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]
Subject: [ippm]

Hello IPPM,

For the past few meetings, we’ve had updates on the work in the SPRING WG that was using STAMP and TWAMP. Since those documents ended up making extensions to the base protocols, the chairs of SPRING and IPPM decided that it would be best to split the documents and track the IPPM extension work in the IPPM WG.

As such, we are starting a Working Group call for adoption for draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm.

The documents are here:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-00
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm-00

The related SPRING documents are here:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-11

Please provide your feedback on these documents, and state whether or not you believe the IPPM WG should adopt this work by replying to this email. Please provide your feedback by the start of the IETF 109 meeting week, on Monday, November 16.

Best,
Tommy & Ian