Subject: [ippm] RFC 9097

From: Kenneth Kerpez <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 13:20:49 +0000

Friends at IPPM,

I've been working with Al and others in the Broadband Forum on the new UDP speed tests now being defined in draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol.
I'd like to express my support for adoption of draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol in RFC 9097.

We plan to use this across many future deployments, for carriers, regulators, and users.

This is a most high-performance, standardized, way of running speed tests, and IETF adoption is vital.

Thanks,
Ken Kerpez
ASSIA Inc.
+1 908 432-1600
[email-masked]

From: ippm <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]%3cmailto:[email-masked]>>> On Behalf Of Marcus Ihlar

Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 10:53 AM

To: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]%3cmailto:[email-masked]>>

Subject: [ippm] draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol

Hi IPPM,

This email starts an adoption call for draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol, " Test Protocol for One-way IP Capacity Measurement".  This document is intended for Standards Track and defines a protocol for measuring Network Capacity metrics defined in RFC 9097 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9097/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9097/__;!!BhdT!3uIFZg83XC7WyNXz9JFuqjOvd4m2Arj8gQk94KqaXVcPo0uS254KMgdekTQI$<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9097/%3chttps:/urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9097/__;!!BhdT!3uIFZg83XC7WyNXz9JFuqjOvd4m2Arj8gQk94KqaXVcPo0uS254KMgdekTQI$>>).

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol/__;!!BhdT!3uIFZg83XC7WyNXz9JFuqjOvd4m2Arj8gQk94KqaXVcPo0uS254KMuggP2kO$<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol/%3chttps:/urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol/__;!!BhdT!3uIFZg83XC7WyNXz9JFuqjOvd4m2Arj8gQk94KqaXVcPo0uS254KMuggP2kO$>>

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol-02<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol-02__;!!BhdT!3uIFZg83XC7WyNXz9JFuqjOvd4m2Arj8gQk94KqaXVcPo0uS254KMuOaN6cK$<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol-02%3chttps:/urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol-02__;!!BhdT!3uIFZg83XC7WyNXz9JFuqjOvd4m2Arj8gQk94KqaXVcPo0uS254KMuOaN6cK$>>

This adoption call will last until Monday, December 20. Please review the document, and reply to this email thread to indicate if you think IPPM should adopt this document.

BR,

Marcus