Subject: -technology & notice

From: Scott Bradner <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 23:38:39 -0400 (EDT)

thomas sez:
> > 5. Notice to be included in RFCs
> >
> >    The RFC Editor will ensure that the following notice is present in
> >    all standards track RFCs and all other RFCs for which an IPR
> >    disclosure has been received.
> 
> Seems the above should apply not just to standards track, but to all
> "IETF Contributions". Saying "standards track" above seems
> inconsistent with other parts of this document.
> 
> To be clear, is the above wording intended to say the "disclaimer' is
> not needed for IETF-produced info and experimental documents? I don't
> understand why we would want to exclude those.

the text says that the disclaimer is not needed for info & exp
IETF RFCs or any RFC Editor rfcs (unless the RFC Editor says otherwise)
except for those RFCs for which IPR disclosures have been received

I have no problem saying that the disclaimer should be in all IETF RFCs
and will do so if no one objects

Scott

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg