Subject: Re: Adoption call of draft-gont-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation for 6MAN

From: "Yuchi Chen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:03:18 +0800

Hi all,

I support the adoption of the draft (sorry if this message is late).

One suspected typo : In section 6 (on page 8), it seems that the paragraph 
' If there is a need to add a Fragment Header (the packet is a fragment), the header 
fields are set as above with the following exceptions:' has a different indentation style 
from the rest of the paragraph. Is there any particular reason?

Best regards!
--------------
Yuchi Chen

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Adoption call of draft-gont-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation
for 6MAN
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:30:18 +0200
From: Ole Troan <[email-masked]>
To: 6man WG <[email-masked]>
CC: 6man Chairs <[email-masked]>
 
All,
 
The authors have requested an adoption call for this document as a standards track document.
 
Please provide a view with reasons as to whether the WG should adopt this or not.
 
This message starts a one week 6MAN Working Group call on adopting:
 
Title           : Deprecating the Generation of IPv6 Atomic Fragments
Author(s)    : F. Gont, W. Liu
Filename    : draft-gont-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-00
Pages        : 6
Date          : 2014-08-19
 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-00
 
The call ends on October 20th, 2014.
 
Regards,
 
Bob Hinden & Ole Trøan

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email-masked]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email-masked]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------