Subject: [Isis-wg] minor conflict between cksum and hmac

From: Nick Amato <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 20:40:19 -0400

Just a minor thing:  draft-ietf-isis-wg-snp-checksum-02.txt states
that an implementation MUST either omit the optional checksum or
set it to zero when also including, for example, an MD5 signature
in an SN PDU.

The hmac draft states that the implementation MUST "not include"
the checksum TLV.

Either will work.  The latter is a bit ambiguous;  it would be nice
to make them consistent.

Nick
_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list  -  [email-masked]
http://external.juniper.net/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg