Subject: Re: [keyassure] Charter discussion - Use of DNSSEC in applications

From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:04:25 -0500 (GMT-05:00)

Andrew and all,

  Very much agreed!  >:)

-----Original Message-----
>From: Andrew Sullivan <[email-masked]>
>Sent: Aug 18, 2010 3:43 PM
>To: [email-masked]
>Subject: Re: [keyassure] Charter discussion - Use of DNSSEC in applications
>
>On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:18:25PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> But really, the discussion of whether I can trust a TLD operator more then
>> a CA operator is outside the scope of this list. I believe what is desired
>> here is a way to use the TLD operator without a CA operator. We already have
>> the reverse case for those interested in that.
>
>Hear, hear.  We don't need to debate whether one approach is better
>than the other.  We're not writing signature-style-choices-bcp.  The
>point is to write something that works interoperably provided that you
>accept the premise that what you want to use is DNSSEC.
>
>A
>
>-- 
>Andrew Sullivan
>[email-masked]
>Shinkuro, Inc.
>_______________________________________________
>keyassure mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure

Regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders and growing, strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail [email-masked]
Phone: 214-244-4827