From: Tom Yu <[email-masked]>
Date: Frk d-b naming has, c)

other ways of solving that bigger problem would be much more
heavy-weight than d-b naming.

That said, I don't mind adding security considerations text as described
above.  I'll write some up and post it.

Note that folks can and, I bet, have used Kerberos V's multi-component
principal naming feature to support naming conventions similar to the
one in d-b naming, thus this would seem like a generic security
consideration for any network authentication scheme with user-extensible
naming.

Nico
-- 

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten