Subject: [L2tpext] Draft minutes from l2tpext

From: "Cheng-Yin Lee" <[email-masked]>
Date: 8 Aug 2002 17:27:24 -0400

Regarding the payload (and application) drafts, are they not being
specified in PWE3 WG, or perhaps I am missing something?

thanks
cheng-yin

> [L2tpext] Draft minutes from l2tpext
>
>
>
>      To: [email-masked]
>      Subject: [L2tpext] Draft minutes from l2tpext
>      From: "W. Mark Townsley"
>      Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:22:12 +0900
>      List-Id: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions
>      Sender: [email-masked]
>
>
>
>
> Please send comments, questions, or alternate recollections to the list.
>
> Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions WG (l2tpext)
>
> TUESDAY, July 16 at 1415-1515
> =============================
>
> CHAIR:  W. Mark Townsley
>
> AGENDA:
>
> 14:15 Agenda Bashing
>       W. Mark Townsley
>
>
> 14:20 L2TPEXT WG Update
>       W. Mark Townsley
>
> No comments from floor - see slides.
>
> Any interest in mcast - no comments, will be put up
> for last call.
>
> Need more participation in tunnel switching
>
> Please read pwe3-fragmentation and comment re 2661
>
> 14:30 L2TPv3 Update
>       Jed Lau
>       draft-ietf-l2tpext-l2tp-base-03.txt
>
> Need clarification of must and may L2TPv3 relative L2TPv2
> Explained that must/may list resolved in v3 by checking what
> made sense in the spec.
> No comments on change to pw specific field or removal of offset.
> Request for contribution - payload and application drafts
>