Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-samples-05

From: Lars Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 11:45:16 +0200

Stewart, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Lars

> On 2021-11-16, at 16:55, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-samples-05
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2021-11-16
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-26
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: A well written document ready for publication
> 
> Major issues:None
> 
> Minor issues:None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> The following terms were used without prior definition in the text: PEM, OCSP,
> CRL - they are well known in the security community, but not in the RFC Editor
> list of well known terms not needing expansion on first use.
> 
> Sections 11 and 12 have no content and can be removed.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> last-call mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call