Subject: IESG comments on draft-ietf-ldapbis-ldapv3-ts-00.txt

From: Patrik Fältström <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 18:34:46 +0100

Can you please look at these things?

  paf

---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Date: torsdag 21 februari 2002 17.39 +0100
From: Patrik Fältström <[email-masked]>
To: Thomas Narten <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-ldapv3-ts-00.txt

I get the point, and agree with your view. Let me pass this to the authors.

  paf

--On 2002-02-21 09.06 -0500 Thomas Narten <[email-masked]> wrote:

> E.g.:
> 
>> The term "LDAPv3" MAY be used to informally refer to the protocol speci-
>> fied by this set of RFCs. The LDAPv3 protocol suite, as defined here,
>> SHOULD be formally identified in other documents by a normative refer-
>> ence to this document.
> 
>> Other RFCs (and perhaps Internet-Drafts) MAY specify extensions to
>> LDAPv3.  Nomenclature denoting such combinations of LDAPv3-plus-
>> extension(s) is not defined by this document, and MAY be defined in some
>> future document(s).
> 
> My suggestion would be to just downcase all usage of the terms.
> 
> Your call if you think this is worth making an issue of.

---------- End Forwarded Message ----------