Subject: Re: [ldapext] Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-01.txt

From: Michael Ströder <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:27:40 +0100

Jim Sermersheim wrote:
> Right, when people on this thread are talking about subentries, they are 
> talking about subentries in the X.500 subentry sense of the word (like 
> subschema subentry, prescriptiveACI subentry, etc).

Then I ask again for use-case(s) of counting these kind of subentries in
`numSubordinates'.

Ciao, Michael.

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext