Subject: Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-passive-interface-attribute-04.txt

From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:13:17 +0000

Hi Aijun, 
You didn't answer my question and pruned my message. Other than your attempt to expose the topology of areas outside the area, there is no other reason to associate the passive interface attribute with a prefix. We seem to be in a circular discussion.... 
Acee

On 9/30/20, 10:43 PM, "[email-masked] on behalf of Aijun Wang" <[email-masked]> wrote:

    Hi, Acee:
    Except the corner cases of unnumbered interface, would you like to illustrate other scenarios that the process does not apply?
    As mentioned in last mail, knowing the passive interfaces can assist the nodes or controller know the boundaries of the network.

    Aijun Wang
    China Telecom

    > On Sep 30, 2020, at 19:47, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email-masked]> wrote:
    >