Subject: Re: [Lsvr] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (to end 17 December 2018)

From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:28:03 +0000

I support WG adoption. This is an innovative new protocol that solves a number of dynamic discovery issues.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Lsvr <[email-masked]> on behalf of Gunter Van de Velde <[email-masked]>
Date: Monday, December 3, 2018 at 9:23 AM
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Victor Kuarsingh <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Lsvr] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (to end 17 December 2018)

Hi All,

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (December 3 – December 17)
and is the procedure follow up of the IETF103 LSVR WG meeting where WG adoption was recognized..

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe/

During your discussion in the WG Adoption Call, the chairs are looking for more context as only a 'yeh' or 'ney'.

Please indicate the following things:
1) Support to adopt draft " draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03" as LSVR WG document?
2) Are there any technical issues with this draft?
3) Which are current pain-points in the draft requiring additional content and technical attention?
4) What is missing from this draft?

The authors (or anybody else) of this draft should send their IPR statements in response to this email.

Kind Regards,
Gunter & Victor
LSVR WG co-chairs