Subject: [Ltru] Fw: RFC 4645bis: making 'pes' and 'prs' extlangs

From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:43:50 -0800

Hi -

A comment from elsewhere on the current drafts, 
forwarded without comment.

Randy

> From: "Michael Everson" <[email-masked]>
> To: "ietflang IETF Languages Discussion" <[email-masked]>
> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 5:54 PM
> Subject: Fwd: RFC 4645bis: making 'pes' and 'prs' extlangs
>
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: Roozbeh Pournader <[email-masked]>
> > Date: 29 November 2008 01:04:39 GMT
> > To: Mark Davis <[email-masked]>, [email-masked], Addison  
> > Phillips <[email-masked]>, [email-masked], Doug Ewell <[email-masked] 
> > >
> > Cc: Michael Everson <[email-masked]>
> > Subject: RFC 4645bis: making 'pes' and 'prs' extlangs
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I could finally get to checking RFC 4645bis and RFC 4646bis. I was
> > wondering what it would take to make "pes", and "prs" (defined in ISO
> > 639-3 to be for "Western Farsi" and "Eastern Farsi/Dari") to become
> > extended languages subtags of "fa" (Persian).
> >
> > This is of course for historical reasons too, since Dari has been  
> > tagged
> > using "fa" or "fa-AF" all these years. (In CLDR and Computer Locale
> > Requirements for Afghanistan [http://www.evertype.com/standards/af/]).
> >
> > Best,
> > Roozbeh
> >
> >
> 
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru