Subject: Re: [manet] Reactive Protocol Situation

From: Jon Black <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:13:48 -0700 (PDT)

On October 31, 2012 at 12:49 PM, JVasseur wrote:

On Oct 31, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Ulrich Herberg wrote: 
Hi JP, 
>Note that IETF cannot be driven by company roadmap. 
>Then please let me hear your technical arguments. So far, you have been only saying that one protocol is in a "GREAT" shape, the other is not, and I believe it is no secret that Cisco also has a company roadmap in this space. 
Let's not go that route … this won't be productive. I am speaking as an individual having spent years working on such issues
as many did too. What would you like ? Lots of experimental and simulation results showing why Load-NG will not work at
scale in LLN ? 

[Jon] Yes, please share something technical.  Just you saying it doesn't work is not productive.
Best
Ulrich
_______________________________________________
manet mailing list [email-masked] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet 
_______________________________________________
manet mailing list [email-masked] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet