Subject: Re: [manet] manet Digest, Vol 171, Issue 9

From: christine Ssemwogerere <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:00:11 +0000 (UTC)

i am carrying ut my research about the blackhole attack on MANETs, but have failed to download NS2, advise me please, thanks
    On Monday, 20 August 2018, 22:01:36 GMT+3, [email-masked] <[email-masked]> wrote:  
 
 Send manet mailing list submissions to
    [email-masked]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    [email-masked]

You can reach the person managing the list at
    [email-masked]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of manet digest..."

Today's Topics:

  1. Re: DLEP LID extension (Rick Taylor)
  2. I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03.txt
      ([email-masked])

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 15:15:20 +0000
From: Rick Taylor <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]"
    <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [manet] DLEP LID extension
Message-ID:
    <[email-masked]>
    
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Sat, 2018-08-18 at 13:56 +0300, Eugene Reznik wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I wanted to make sure that I correctly understand the draft-ietf-
> manet-dlep-lid-extension-02 .
> 
> The draft says in paragraph 3.1. that the default length of the link
> identifier data item is 4.
> However, in paragraph 3.2. it says that the default length of the
> link identifier data item is 5.
> The value of 5 made sense in previous drafts in presence of the Flags
> field. The Flags field length was 1 octet, which led to the overall
> length of 5 (4 octets of the link identifier plus 1 octet of the
> Flags field).
> In this draft there is no mention of the Flags field.

Hi Eugene,

This looks like a typo.  The field length should be 4, not 5.  There
once was a Flags field, but as it had no obvious use, so it was
removed.  Obviously that part of the text wasn't updated to reflect the
change - I'll update in my working copy and it will be in any further
releases!

Thanks,

Rick

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:28:14 -0700
From: [email-masked]
To: <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [manet] I-D Action:
    draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03.txt
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks WG of the IETF.

        Title          : DLEP Link Identifier Extension
        Authors        : Rick Taylor
                          Stan Ratliff
    Filename        : draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03.txt
    Pages          : 7
    Date            : 2018-08-20

Abstract:
  There exists a class of modems that wish to support the Dynamic Link
  Exchange Protocol (DLEP) [RFC8175] but do not present a single Layer
  2 network domain as required by DLEP.  Such devices may be:

  o  Modems that maintain a varying link to some upstream backbone
      network infrastructure, where the ability to announce link state
      and DLEP metrics is desired, but the concept of a DLEP destination
      router for the backbone does not apply.  Examples of such devices
      can include LTE modems, IEEE 802.11 stations not in ad-hoc mode,
      and some satellite terminals.

  o  Modems that provide Layer 3 wide area network connectivity between
      devices, where individual DLEP destinations do exist, but are not
      directly reachable by MAC address.

  This document introduces an optional extension to the core DLEP
  specification, allowing DLEP to be used between routers and modems
  that operate in this way.

  Note:

  o  This document is intended as an extension to the core DLEP
      specification, and readers are expected to be fully conversant
      with the operation of core DLEP.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet

------------------------------

End of manet Digest, Vol 171, Issue 9
*************************************