Subject: [marf] draft-ietf-marf-redaction

From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:18:40 -0700

Other than a few grammatical nits, I'm happy with this document.  I think this reflects the recommended practice that's derived from the original ARF work.

Are there any FBLs doing this now?  This would be helpful to note as the document prepares to advance.

-MSK