Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01

From: Tina TSOU <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 04:41:06 +0000

Well, gentlemen, how do you call it?

(1) WG accepts work item and 
draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition is a candidate;

(2) WG accepts work item and 
draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition is a candidate if rewritten; or

(3) WG does not accept work item.

Tina

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf
> Of Leonard Giuliano
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 1:24 PM
> To: MBONED WG
> Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01
> 
> 
> We would like to poll the WG to decide if
> draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01 should be adopted as an
> MBONED document.  Please respnd by May 29 if you thing this doc should or
> should not be adopted by MBONED.
> 
> 
> -MBONED Chairs
> 
> 
> On Thu, 10 May 2012, Tina TSOU wrote:
> 
> -) Dear chairs,
> -) Would you ask the WG for adoption of draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-
> acquisition-01 as WG document?
> -)
> -) Thank you and have a good day.
> -)
> -) Tina and co-authors
> -)
> -) From: Tina TSOU
> -) Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 11:58 AM
> -) To: [email-masked]
> -) Subject: draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01
> -)
> -)
> -) Now that the multicast transition framework document is officially
> accepted, is the Working Group prepared also to take on the topic of
> address acquisition, which is one of the tasks it identifies?
> -) If so, would draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01 be
> acceptable as a starting point?
> -)
> -) Tina
> -)
> -)
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned