Subject: [Mipshop] [issue6] Should the specification specify a particular stateful address assignment mechanism?

From: Rajeev <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:51:45 +0000

New submission from Rajeev <[email-masked]>:

Should the FMIP specification define _how_ the NAR is able to
provide NCoA for a MN to use? Or, merely define transport
messages which can carry the NCoA, but does not specify the
mechanism used by NAR to obtain a (duplicate-free) NCoA.

----------
category: Technical
draft: draft-ietf-mipshop-rfc4068bis
messages: 18
nosy: rajeev
priority: Must fix
status: Pending
title: Should the specification specify a particular stateful address assignment mechanism?

_____________________________________________________
Mipshop issue tracker <[email-masked]>
<http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/mipshop/issue6>
_____________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop