Subject: RE: [Mipshop] Re: HI/HAck in the current spec

From: "Soliman, Hesham" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:44:59 -0400

> >> Also, I don't think 3775 is really the issue. The issue 
 > is oDAD. DAD is 
 > >> always done in the kernel.
 > >>
 > >
 > > I would still like to be careful with _requiring _ kernel changes.
 > >
 > 
 > This is an implementation issue. Some things do require 
 > kernel changes by 
 > their nature, but others don't. Not all of 3775 needs to be 
 > in the kernel.

=> I completely agree with James here. This is a second order optimisation.
Let's make sure it works correctly first then discuss if this is an
issue for implementations. Requiring kernel changes is not so horrifying, 
many implementations support 3775 completely in the kernel. The first
implementation I worked on did exactly that. 

Hesham

 > 
 >             jak 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > Mipshop mailing list
 > [email-masked]
 > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
 > 

===========================================================
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
 of the intended recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly
 prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender
 and delete all copies.
===========================================================

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop