Subject: [MMUSIC] Rtspspec-bugs digest, Vol 1 #32 - 4 msgs

From: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 18:28:02 -0800

This is an automatic digest of bugs submitted and changed on the RTSP bug tracker.  To see a list of bugs, visit:

http://sf.net/projects/rtspspec

When replying, please make your Subject line more specific than "Re: Rtspspec-bugs digest"

Today's Topics:

   1. [ rtspspec-Bugs-538997 ] Need to flesh out 1.5 (Extending RTSP) ([email-masked])
   2. [ rtspspec-Bugs-539001 ] Transport header should override m= ([email-masked])
   3. [ rtspspec-Bugs-477427 ] Transport model requirements ([email-masked])
   4. [ rtspspec-Bugs-539040 ] Conference header underspecified ([email-masked])

--__--__--

Message: 1
To: [email-masked]
From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:26:18 -0800
Subject: [rtspspec-bugs] [ rtspspec-Bugs-538997 ] Need to flesh out 1.5 (Extending RTSP)

Bugs item #538997, was opened at 2002-04-03 15:26
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=538997&group_id=23194

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Need to flesh out 1.5 (Extending RTSP)

Initial Comment:
We need to have a larger "Extending RTSP" section in
the draft:

A first (very rough) cut at this was posted here:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/mmusic/current/msg00377.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=538997&group_id=23194

--__--__--

Message: 2
To: [email-masked]
From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:32:06 -0800
Subject: [rtspspec-bugs] [ rtspspec-Bugs-539001 ] Transport header should override m=

Bugs item #539001, was opened at 2002-04-03 15:32
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=539001&group_id=23194

Category: General
Group: Fix for DS - Need WG Input
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Assigned to: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Summary: Transport header should override m=

Initial Comment:
Section C.1.7 ("Connection Information") states the
following:  "for on-demand unicast streams and some
multicast streams, the destination is specified by the
client via the SETUP request".  The rest of this
section mainly refers to the "c=" line in SDP, but it's
not clear that the SETUP Transport header also
overrides the port given in the m= line.  Clarification
of this is needed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=539001&group_id=23194

--__--__--

Message: 3
To: [email-masked]
From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 16:03:34 -0800
Subject: [rtspspec-bugs] [ rtspspec-Bugs-477427 ] Transport model requirements

Bugs item #477427, was opened at 2001-11-01 23:49
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=477427&group_id=23194

Category: None
Group: Fix - Discussed/Resolved
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Westerlund (magwes)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Transport model requirements

Initial Comment:
Which connection models are required. Is non persitent TCP connections a MUST support, or only 
RECOMMENDED?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2002-04-03 16:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

Current section 1.1 has text which is counter to our
resolution:  "There is no notion of an RTSP connection...."

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2002-03-17 20:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

Discussed in RTSP telecon Jan 23
(http://rtsp.org/2002/telecon/minutes23Jan.html#line90)

  RESOLVED: define header and response for non-persistent
connections. Default is connection-oriented, and
connectionless MAY be implemented. Look into "supported" header.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2001-12-13 10:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

Good question.  This is related to #492546

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=477427&group_id=23194

--__--__--

Message: 4
To: [email-masked]
From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 17:16:58 -0800
Subject: [rtspspec-bugs] [ rtspspec-Bugs-539040 ] Conference header underspecified

Bugs item #539040, was opened at 2002-04-03 17:16
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=539040&group_id=23194

Category: General
Group: Fix for DS - Need WG Input
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Assigned to: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Summary: Conference header underspecified

Initial Comment:
The "Conference" header specified in section 12.10 of
the 2326bis00 is underspecified, and not implemented by
known implementations.

Proposal:  Remove section 12.10 and section 3.3
(Conference Identifiers).

MMUSIC discussion: 
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/mmusic/current/msg00416.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=539040&group_id=23194

End of Rtspspec-bugs Digest

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic