Subject: Re: [mpls] Comments on ITU's Work Plan for Optical Transport Networks

From: Greg Bernstein <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:06:47 -0700

Hi Adrian and WGs, looking at the ITU-T SG 15's Optical work plan. They 
put an emphasis on Metro Optical Networks and point out that these can 
be different from long haul networks in that that they may not need to 
use regenerators and that these may be significantly more "dynamic" with 
respect to provisioning than long haul DWDM networks. 
We should point them at CCAMP's  WSON work which includes both the 
Framework document and the RWA info model document.  The modeling of 
asymmetric switches such as ROADMs seems to have been overlooked at the 
ITU-T.

Regards

Greg

Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We received a liaison back in February 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/425/) asking for our comments on 
> ITU-T Study Group 15's "Optical Transport Networks & Technologies 
> Standardization Work Plan" 
> (http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com15/otn/index.html)
>
> Please let me know by Friday September 5th if you have any comments 
> you would like us to make. If I don't receive anything, I will send a 
> response to thank them for keeping us informed and asking them to 
> share any future work plans with us.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>

-- 
===================================================
Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls