Subject: [mpls] Errata report for RFC 3031

From: "Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:13:05 +0100

Hi,

Renato Westphal raised http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3689

In this he questions the action in downstream-on-demand independent mode when
the downstream neighbor does not have a next hop for the requested prefix.

The I-D says that the case is N/A, by which I assume it is intended to imply
that the case cannot arise.

Renato believes that the action should be 'RequestRetry' claiming that 'N/A' can
only apply if the Request Procedure is 'RequestNever'.

Your opinions please.

Thanks,
Adrian