Subject: [mpls] Update on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib

From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:52:13 +0000

Hi,

While this document was being last called, a mibs document in trill was being reviewed by the IESG. The Security ADs commented that they needed to update the security section. As our MPLS document is more or less a cut and paste of the trill security section, I've asked the authors to do a review and update our document so as not to repeat the discussion. As it's only a couple of sentences, I've place the document on next week's telechat as the authors promised a new version by Monday next week.

A heads-up for all of you, there is much more interest to ensure IETF's work on security is solid. Security sections which simply say "there is no new security concerns" will not pass. Authors need to explain why there are no new security concerns.

Thanks,
Deborah