Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time

From: Eric Gray <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 17:48:47 +0000

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

-----Original Message-----
From: John E Drake [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 8:11 AM
To: Loa Andersson; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time

I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

Yours Irrespectively,

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 10:21 PM
> To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time has told us that the document is ready to be
> considered for working group last call.
> 
> We will do an IPR poll prior to the start of the wg last call.
> 
> This mail starts the IPR poll.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
> and 5378 for more details).
> 
> There is one IPR disclosure filed against the document that was replaced by the current
> draft.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless
> of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to
> the MPLS wg mailing list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a response
> has been received from each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then
> please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in
> conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> 
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: [email-masked]
> Senior MPLS Expert                          [email-masked]
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64