Subject: Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-02.txt

From: Dean Anderson <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:49:49 -0400 (EDT)

Why is this irrelevant to namedroppers? The entire purpose and effect
of the proposed changes should be considered.

Putting blinders on, and then making a decision is a formula for bad
decision making.

On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:

> > > > It is quite possible to solve the problem of long term abuse in a ...
> > >
> > > This is nothing other than a blacklist scheme.
> >
> > ... The draft appears to be attempting to set out a whitelisting scheme ...
>
> please limit namedroppers@ discussion of this draft to the dns aspects, like
> whether special processing ought to be a requirement, or whether compression
> should be used.  the application layer aspects of RMX (and RMX vs MAILFROM)
> will be discussed elsewhere, and i don't think the namedroppers@ audience
> needs to see that debate, whereas others elsewhere who don't read namedroppers@
> *do* need to see that debate.  ergo, please don't have it here.
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>