Subject: Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-02.txt

From: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:48:27 +1000

> 
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> 
> > > The cost of altering the worlds DNS servers is usually considered high.
> >
> > If the world's DNS servers are compatible with d-i-dnsext-unknown-rrs,
> > no changes to them are required to support RMX.  Other systems (e.g.,
> > DNSSEC) are contingent on d-i-dnsext-unknown-rrs, so I don't think
> > there is much practical merit to this argument against RMX.
> 
> Except that, unless I am mistaken, dnsext-unknown-rrs is just a draft.
> 
> 		--Dean

	Compression is not allowed by RFC 1034.  dnsext-unknown-rrs
	just reinforces it.
 
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: [email-masked]

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>