Subject: Re: [netconf] WGLC on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server

From: Kent Watsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 19:35:11 +0000

There was a private comment regarding the missing tree-diagram in Appendix A [1].   The intention is to completely remove Appendix A, as the fully-expanded tree-diagrams are nearly impossible to read.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server#appendix-A <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server#appendix-A>

Kent (as author)

> On Aug 25, 2021, at 11:44 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> We are starting a 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server version 23. The extra week because the US is coming up to some holidays in that time period. The document can be found here:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server/
> 
> Please respond on this thread indicating your support or concerns about why this document should/should not be adopted.
> 
> We are particularly interested in statement of the form:
> 
> - I have reviewed the draft and found no issues. 
> - I have reviewed the draft and found the following issues …
> 
> This WGLC will conclude on Wednesday, September 15. An IPR call will be issued separately.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf