Subject: Re: [netlmm] Review of draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6-01.txt and draft-singh-netlmm-protocol-00.txt

From: Behcet Sarikaya <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:54:14 -0800 (PST)

Hi Jari,

If we are to make a choice between these two drafts and if we have to be bound by the current draft-netlmm's as well, then it looks like the choice is quite clear, as probably implied in Pete's mail.
More comments inline.

----- Original Message ----
From: Jari Arkko <[email-masked]>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <[email-masked]>
Cc: McCann Peter-A001034 <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:29:26 AM
Subject: Re: [netlmm] Review of draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6-01.txt and draft-singh-netlmm-protocol-00.txt

Bechet,

Actually, I think Pete raises an important point. The output
from this working group should be consistent with regards
to terminology.

And the consensus call was on approach only. It was clearly
stated that further work is needed. And that we're not
compromising on functionality because of a particular
protocol choice. There was and still is a need to deal with
technical issues, terminology issues, revise drafts etc.

[Behcet] On the terminology, netlmm DT's LMA architecturally does not correspond to HA, it may
correspond to MAP. Not only myself but some other people clarified this on the list.
And HA was stated as an important entity to have in the solution by several people because of the maximum reuse we can get from MIP. Isn't this an important consideration as well?

[Behcet] I think that no draft that is currently being discussed is using netlmm DT's MAG, PMIP client and PMA are being proposed, collocated with AR. 

[Behcet] So my question is do we really have a terminology issue?

And -- drafts need to meet the expectations of the working
group and trusted reviewers like Pete.

[Behcet] Sure.

So, lets get to work if we want to have a standard out
at the end.

[Behcet] Absolutely.

Jari

--behcet

... deleted the rest.

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm