Subject: Re: [nfsv4] cancelling READW_LT/WRITEW_LT locks

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:55:27 -0500 (EST)

> The rfc doesn't address this problem, though.  What do other
> implementations do?

My interpretation of Sec. 8.4 was that it was optional ("may/should", not
"must/shall"), so I just didn't implement it. A READ_LT or WRITE_LT done
later will either succeed or return NFS4ERR_DENIED, depending on whether
or not the conflict still exists, for my server. (In other words, my
server treates READW_LT, WRITEW_LT just the same as READ_LT, WRITE_LT.)

rick

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4