Subject: [OPSAWG] draft-kikuchi-tunnel-measure-req-01: "passive"

From: [email-masked] (Scott O. Bradner)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:46:33 -0400 (EDT)

it seems to me that calling this technology "passive" when it can
modify packets on the fly is not accurate - I'm not sure
what better to say - maybe just do not try to characterize it
as active or passive

Scott

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg