Subject: RE: Issue 15

From: "Mohan Parthasarathy" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:36:08 -0700

Yes, this makes sense and consitent with approaches in other protocols.

-mohan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alper Yegin [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:19 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Issue 15
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Let's get back on the issue list and continue resolving them.
> 
> Issue 15 is about using cookie vs. puzzle for DoS prevention. 
> The recommended resolution at the meeting was to:
> - only include (mandatory to implement, optional to use) 
> cookie mechanism in the base draft
> - allow alternative mechanisms like puzzles defined in 
> separate drafts.
> 
> I, without my co-chair hat on, agree to this resolution. What 
> do others think? If there is no objection, we can close this issue.
> 
> Alper
> 
>