Subject: Re: [paws] IPR Disclosure: InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-paws-protocol-06

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:40:53 +0000

It's been almost 6 weeks since this announcement was sent out and nobody indicated on the list yet having any problems with this patent.
If you have any problems, please indicate to the list asap or be prepared to speak up at the mike during the f2f. If no issues are raised before or during the f2f I'll take that as nobody has any problems.

-gabor

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of ext Pete Resnick
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:30 AM
To: Brian Rosen
Cc: [email-masked]; IETF Secretariat; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [paws] IPR Disclosure: InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-paws-protocol-06

On 9/24/13 7:54 AM, Brian Rosen wrote:

> As always when we get these kinds of notices, we need to ask if anyone 
> has concerns about the notice that might cause us to change direction 
> on our protocol.

And just to be clear: None of us in leadership are going to evaluate the merits of any patent. Basically what we're asking of the WG is for you all to take a look at the information provided in the disclosure and see if this would cause you (or anyone else you know of) problems with implementing the current protocol interoperably. If so, let the rest of us know why/how, and we can discuss whether we need to work around the problem. But it is for each of you to evaluate the disclosure and the intellectual property referenced therein.

pr

--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws