Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Feed-back required ondraft-farrel-pce-manageability-requirements-02.txt

From: "LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:49:49 +0100

Hi Jean-Philippe, Adrian, all

The manageability section will be really useful. I support this draft as WG document.

Regards

JL

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : JP Vasseur [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Envoyé : mercredi 3 janvier 2007 19:13
> À : [email-masked]
> Cc : Dan ((Dan)) Romascanu
> Objet : [Pce] WG Feed-back required 
> ondraft-farrel-pce-manageability-requirements-02.txt
> 
> Dear WG,
> 
> The idea of adding a Manageability section to IDs was first 
> introduced by Adrian and discussed at IETF-65 Dallas March 
> 2006 (for reference, see the WG minutes) since then two 
> revisions of draft- farrel-pce-manageability-requirements 
> have been published based on the comments received from 
> members of the PCE WG and OPS ADs.
> 
> My recollection of the discussions about this ID is a general 
> good support from members of the PCE WG and OPS AD (thanks to 
> Dan for his help). The were some concerns from Lou that have 
> been addressed in the latest revision of the draft.
> 
> Furthermore, there are several IDs in the works for which the 
> authors agreed to add a manageability section and 
> "experiment" the process that may have to be tuned as we'll 
> move forward.
> 
> Because, this ID does have some implication on (current and 
> future) PCE WG IDs, I'd welcome feed-back on adopting this ID 
> as a WG document.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce