Subject: Re: [Pce] Regd pcep-service-aware & pcep-link-bw-utilization drafts

From: Dhruv Dhody <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 05:45:59 +0000

Hi WG, 

We have uploaded the merged document. 

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-06

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-06

Note that there are no major technical change, just reorganization to accommodate the draft-wu-pce-pcep-link-bw-utilization text. 
Request WG to have a relook and provide comments on this version. As the companion OSPF/ISIS WG documents have made progress and heading to IESG, we would be requesting PCE WG to move this document along as well. 

Thanks! 
Dhruv 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
> Sent: 14 November 2014 10:26
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Pce] Regd pcep-service-aware & pcep-link-bw-utilization
> drafts
> 
> Hi,
> 
> During the discussion with chairs regarding moving the following
> drafts along  -
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware/
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-pce-pcep-link-bw-
> utilization/
> 
> It was pointed out that for the sake of consistency with OSPF/ISIS-
> metric extension documents (in post-WG-LC and ongoing-WG-LC), that
> having a single merged document from PCEP would be a better choice.
> 
> We can merge the second document content into the first one and get a
> new version out soon after IETF week, once the dust is settled.
> 
> If you have concerns with this approach, do let us know.
> 
> Thanks!
> Dhruv
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce