Subject: [Pce] FW: VN Association @ PCE

From: Leeyoung <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 07:15:01 +0000

Hi Jon,

The following is the text agreed upon between Igor and Dhruv and myself. 
--- we will update the draft with this added text in the revision.

NEW: VN association can be generally applicable to bundle TE tunnel sets where a VN member within a VN corresponds to a TE tunnel

Thanks.
Young

-----Original Message-----
From: Leeyoung 
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 1:07 AM
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <[email-masked]>; Igor Bryskin <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: VN Association @ PCE

Hi Dhruv,

Igor agreed with the proposal. 

Young

-----Original Message-----
From: Leeyoung 
Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 11:06 PM
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <[email-masked]>; Igor Bryskin <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: VN Association @ PCE

Igor,

On your comment on PCE VN association: 
> Igor: This is a good idea but could it be done in a generic way rather at a
>       "VN association" specifically. Just like a group of LSPs in a mesh.

Our resolution is to add text: "VN association can be generally applicable to bundle TE tunnel sets where a VN member within a VN corresponds to a TE tunnel."

What do you think? 

Thanks.
Young

-----Original Message-----
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 10:35 PM
To: Leeyoung <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: VN Association @ PCE

Lets talk this over! We need to get Igor on board as well.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:25 AM Leeyoung <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> Hi Dhruv,
>
> I think we can say that VN association includes tunnel sets. When defining VN, we can say we can bundle TE tunnels.
>
> What do you think? We may add text: "VN association can be generally applicable to bundle TE tunnel sets."
>
> Young
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 8:58 PM
> To: Leeyoung <[email-masked]>
> Subject: VN Association @ PCE
>
> Hi Young,
>
> We will be asked if we have resolved the Igor comments on the mic from IETF 102.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-102-pce/
>
> 4. Previously Discussed Topics
> 4.1. ACTN VN Association (Daniele Ceccarelli, 10 min) [90/90]
> draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association-05
>
> Igor: This is a good idea but could it be done in a generic way rather at a
>       "VN association" specifically. Just like a group of LSPs in a mesh.
> Daniele Ceccarelli: Association is anyway generic, This is a new association
>                     type, you could define another!
> Igor: Think of a TE tunnel set.
> Daniele: You can define another association.
> Young: What Igor is asking is can it cover more than VN, with a generic TE
>        tunnel set included.
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv