Subject: Re: [pcp] Mandatory OPTIONS

From: "Dan Wing" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:36:27 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
> Francis Dupont
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:38 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [pcp] Mandatory OPTIONS
> 
> 
>  In your previous mail you wrote:
> 
>    2.  Any Option which "Number" is higher than 128 is, by definition,
>    optional, while those which "Number" is smaller than 128 is, by
>    definition, mandatory?
> 
> => this one with "Code" in place of "Number" even it makes "opcode"
> a bit ambiguous...

I cleaned that up in the upcoming version by removing discussion
of the "O" bit, and instead just discussing the most significant
bit of the Option Code which indicates optional/mandatory.  Hopefully
that makes it clearer.  If not, suggestions to fix the text would
be appreciated.

-d