Subject: Re: [pcp] suggested external address

From: Francis Dupont <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:44:29 +0200

In your previous mail you wrote:

    - should a CANNOT_PROVIDE_EXTERNAL_ADDR be defined?
   
=> or CANNOT_PROVIDE_EXTERNAL_PORT renamed to CANNOT_PROVIDE_EXTERNAL
(a shorter name should never a bad idea :-)

Regards
   
[email-masked]

---

From: Tina TSOU <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:23:00 +0000

Francis,
I meant client needs to proactively request same external IP.

Tina

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Francis Dupont
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 11:44 AM
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [pcp] suggested external address

   

Regards
   
[email-masked]
_______________________________________________
pcp mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp

---

From: Francis Dupont <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:30:05 +0200

=> but they can easily do it by using a PREFER_FAILURE if
my interpretation of the MAP request processing is correct.

Regards