Subject: Re: [pcp] Deleting mappings

From: "Dan Wing" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:15:39 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
> Francis Dupont
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:26 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [pcp] Deleting mappings
> 
> 
>  In your previous mail you wrote:
> 
> 
>    "- there was a discuss about implicit deletes, so current proposal
> is:
> 
>       * if we decide to provide implicit dynamic mapping deletion, it
> will be
>        by a PEER with lifetime zero
>    "
> 
> => and at the last IETF we decided to not provide a way to delete
> dynamic mapping as no use of this was found.
> 
>    So, my question is: does a MAP with lifetime = 0 delete any kind of
>    dynamic mappings (implicit and explicit) or just explicit dynamic
>    mappings?
> 
> => just explicit dynamic mappings and in particular *not* static
> mappings.

This should be clearer in the soon-to-be-published -14.

-d

> Thanks
> 
> [email-masked]
> 
> PS: as far as I know there is no text about the detailed
> behavior of a lifetime 0 PEER request...
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp