Subject: Re: [pcp] a question about the UNPROCESSED option

From: "Dan Wing" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:25:05 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
> Francis Dupont
> Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 8:14 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [pcp] a question about the UNPROCESSED option
> 
> Still about conformance testing, I have no good idea about what to do
> with an UNPROCESSED option included in a PCP request:
>  - the only clear thing is this MUST raise an error
>  - there are 3 candidates:
>   * UNSUPP_OPTION but according to my previous message the next one
>    is better
>   * MALFORMED_OPTION seems to be the best candidate but perhaps the
>    next one is even better
>   * MALFORMED_REQUEST which means the request is plain wrong
>  - should we add an UNPROCESSED option? IMHO it should not add
>   an UNPROCESSED option for this reason, i.e., if there can be one
>   because and only because of another bad option

I added:

        The
        UNPROCESSED option MUST NOT appear in a request; if it does, it
        causes a MALFORMED_REQUEST error.

-d

> Thanks
> 
> [email-masked]
> 
> PS: of course this is at lowest priority...
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp