Subject: RE: GFP PW

From: Shahram Davari <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:57:09 -0700

Hi Sasha,

I am not sure we need the complexity of CEP emulation, specially when the
traffic is not real-time.

Yours,
-Shahram

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sasha Vainshtein [mailto:[email-masked]]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:16 PM
>To: Shahram Davari
>Cc: PWE3 WG (E-mail); 'Luca Martini'
>Subject: RE: [PWE3] GFP PW
>
>
>Shahram,
>Please note that the latest CEP draft (draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-02.txt)
>provides for carrying a dynamically changing bunch of virtually 
>concatenated VTs. IMO this is a good substitute for a 
>dedicated GFP/LCAS PW.  
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------
>--------
>With best regards,
>                          Sasha Vainshtein
>email:   [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> 
>phone:  +972-3-7659993 (office)
>            +972-8-9254948 (home)
>            +972-58-674833 (cellular)
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shahram Davari [mailto:[email-masked]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:58 PM
>> To: 'Luca Martini'
>> Cc: PWE3 WG (E-mail)
>> Subject: [PWE3] GFP PW
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Luca,
>> 
>> Is it possible to add GFP to the HDLC and PPP draft?
>> 
>> Yours,
>> -Shahram
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>> 
>