Subject: [PWE3] Re: RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-pwe3-control-protocol-17.txt [I06-050706-0005]

From: Luca Martini <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:38:06 -0600

Michelle,

I apologize for not specifying the "E" column in the document. 
The "E" column is set to 0 for all the entries that you added.

Thank you.
Luca Martini

[email-masked] wrote:

>Authors:
>
>We have completed the IANA Actions for RFC-to-be:
>draft-ietf-pwe3-control-protocol-17.txt
>
>We have registered 3 TLV types:
>
>0x096A   PW Status TLV                       
>0x096B   PW Interface Parameters TLV        
>0x096C   Group ID TLV                       
>
>We have registered 8 LDP status codes:
>
>0x00000024            Illegal C-Bit                    
>0x00000025            Wrong C-Bit                      
>0x00000026            Incompatible bit-rate            
>0x00000027            CEP-TDM mis-configuration       
>0x00000028            PW Status                        
>0x00000029            Unassigned/Unrecognized TAI       
>0x0000002A            Generic Misconfiguration Error    
>0x0000002B            Label Withdraw PW Status Method
>
>QUESTION: What should the "E" Column be for the above status codes?
>0 or 1?
>
>We have registered 2 FEC Type Name Spaces:
>
>0x80        PWid FEC Element                 
>0x81        Generalized PWid FEC Element      
>
>See: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ldp-namespaces
>
>Please let us know if all looks OK.  As soon as we receive your response (only one response on behalf of all the authors is needed) we will notify the RFC-Editor that the IANA Actions have been completed.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Michelle Cotton
>IANA
>
>
>
>
>       
>  
>

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3