Subject: Re: Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues, week of 25 September

From: Mark Nottingham <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:00:37 -0700

There's been some more discussion on #2152 and #3053, so we'll remove the 'proposal-ready' flag on those and hopefully nail down solutions this week. For the rest, consensus declared.

> On 25 Sep 2019, at 12:30 am, Mark Nottingham <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them next week.
> 
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
> 
> * #3053: Padding requirement seems to be incorrect.
>  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/commit/6cfcbe26385>
> 
> * #3034: Allow PING in Initial/Handshake?
>  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3035>
> 
> * #3030: Remove Requirement of an Acknowledgement per Round Trip
>  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3055>
> 
> * #3010: Validating 0-RTT configuration in TLS API
>  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2947>
> 
> * #2785: Disallow reuse of stateless reset tokens
>  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2968>
> 
> * #2152: Why does stateless reset have to be checked after MAC failure
>  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2993>
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/