Subject: [Errata Rejected] RFC9067 (6845)

From: RFC Errata System <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 10:55:44 -0800 (PST)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC9067,
"A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6845

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Kris Lambrechts <[email-masked]>
Date Reported: 2022-02-10
Rejected by: Alvaro Retana (IESG)

Section: 7.2.

Original Text
-------------
               list prefix-list {
                 key "ip-prefix mask-length-lower mask-length-upper";
                 description
                   "List of prefixes in the prefix set.";
                 uses prefix;
               }

Corrected Text
--------------
               list prefix {
                 key "ip-prefix mask-length-lower mask-length-upper";
                 description
                   "List of prefixes in the prefix set.";
                 uses prefix;
               }

Notes
-----
The name of this list is not natural and makes instance data hard to read. This is very apparent in the example in Appendix B.  Policy Examples
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
   From the WG discussion: "This is a rather subjective comment since at this YANG data node is, in fact, a list. Also, it is a moot point since changing this would be a non-backward compatible YANG change."

--------------------------------------
RFC9067 (draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-31)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy
Publication Date    : October 2021
Author(s)           : Y. Qu, J. Tantsura, A. Lindem, X. Liu
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Routing Area Working Group
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG