Subject: RE: [Sigtran] IPSP / SG-SG models applied to other UAs

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 06:41:18 +0300

Hi Marc,

> For a couple of weeks the discussions about IPSP vs SG-SG 
> models have focused on m3ua because it seems simpler to agree 
> on a model for m3ua, and then apply it on other UAs. Despite 
> this "simplification" no concensus has been reached yet. 
> Could we check how the two remaining models (IPSP-SE and 
> SG-SG) would also apply to other UAs such as SUA or TUA ? If 
> it comes out that one model fits to a wider range of UAs, 
> could we agree that the 1st priority is to complete its 
> definition ? This would also greatly help to stabilize 
> implementations before the next plugtest.

I agree, the model should be applied to the other UAs as well.
We have enough debate on one UA, so I assumed it would be best
to get closure on the current debate first.

John

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran