Subject: [Sigtran] m3ua IG-v01: RK for IPSP

From: "Tolga Asveren" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:55:17 -0400

Javier,

In section 4.4.3, why do we have the sentence "In the case of RC use, RCs
SHOULD be previously agreed between both peers"? This sentence limits the
use of dynamic registration for IPSP to the case where traffic belonging to
only one RK is carried over an association. And also again in the same
section, why are we trying to limit use of dynamic registration to PC
granularity?

   Tolga

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran