Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Status Fied in TEI Status Messages

From: Ken Morneault <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 13:01:57 -0400

I agree that the Status field in these messages is mandatory.

Regards,

Ken

At 12:34 PM 6/24/2002 +0530, [email-masked] wrote:

>Hi Arun,
>the Status field in the TEI status confirm/Indication message (sec- 3.3.3.3, RFC
>3057)
>should be taken as  mandatory(else there is no way you will
>be able to convey the TEI status to the peer). though it is not mentioned
>explicitly in the parameter description (unlike in other messages), since
>the message has only one parameter and it is not mentioned as "OPTIONAL" also.
>so, there is enough reason to consider it as "mandatory" :).
>
>regards,
>-Dipak
>
>
>
>
>
>Arun Panda <[email-masked]> on 06/23/2002 04:02:34 PM
>
>To:   "'Sigtran'" <[email-masked]>
>cc:    (bcc: Dipak Bash/HSS)
>
>Subject:  [Sigtran] Status Fied in TEI Status Messages
>
>
>
>
>Hello
>
>Is the Status field in the TEI Status Confirm and Indication Message
>Mandatory or Optional ?
>
>
>Thanks and Regards
>
>Arun Panda
>Ind-Telesoft Pvt Ltd
>104, Koramangala Indl Estate
>5th Block , Koramangala - 560095
>Ph - 5521937 - 40, Ext - 419
><mailto:[email-masked]>
>
>Vision without action is a daydream.
>Action without vision is a nightmare
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sigtran mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sigtran mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran 

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran