Subject: RE: [Sigtran] M3UA IG v04

From: "J.Javier Pastor (EE/EEM)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:48:51 +0200

Hi Francois, 

Pls see below....

Cheers // Javier.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zannin, Francois [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: miércoles, 09 de julio de 2003 16:21
> To: Ken Morneault; J.Javier Pastor (EE/EEM); [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: [Sigtran] M3UA IG v04
> 
> 
> Ken,
> 
> My point of view on he question, see hereafter.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Francois Z.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Morneault [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 3:56 PM
> To: Zannin, Francois; J.Javier Pastor (EE/EEM); [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: [Sigtran] M3UA IG v04
> 
> 
> Francois,
> 
> Pls see comments below.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ken
> 
> At 10:15 AM 7/9/2003 +0200, Zannin, Francois wrote:
> >Just some comment about the M3UA IG v04
> >
> >3.21 NOTIFY messages are missing in Examples section
> >Figure (section 5.1.2)
> >        a NOTIFY(AS-INACTIVE) must be sent from SGP to ASP2 
> after the 
> >ASP Up Ack
> >
> >Figure (section 5.1.3)
> >        a NOTIFY(AS-INACTIVE) must be sent from SGP to ASP2 
> after the 
> >ASP Up Ack
> >
> >Figure (section 5.1.4)
> >        Same remark, the Notify is sent to ASP1, ASP2 and 
> also need to 
> >be sent to
> >      ASP3 after the ASP Up Ack
> 

It is sent at that point because n=2 for that particular example. I.e. when 2 ASPs reach the ASP-INACTIVE state, the AS is considered in AS-INACTIVE state.

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran