Subject: RE: [Sigtran] M3UA IG v04

From: "Zannin, Francois" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 16:20:45 +0200

Ken,

My point of view on he question, see hereafter.

Regards,

Francois Z.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Morneault [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Zannin, Francois; J.Javier Pastor (EE/EEM); [email-masked]
Subject: RE: [Sigtran] M3UA IG v04

Francois,

Pls see comments below.

Regards,

Ken

At 10:15 AM 7/9/2003 +0200, Zannin, Francois wrote:
>Just some comment about the M3UA IG v04
>
>3.21 NOTIFY messages are missing in Examples section
>Figure (section 5.1.2)
>        a NOTIFY(AS-INACTIVE) must be sent from SGP to ASP2 after the 
>ASP Up Ack
>
>Figure (section 5.1.3)
>        a NOTIFY(AS-INACTIVE) must be sent from SGP to ASP2 after the 
>ASP Up Ack
>
>Figure (section 5.1.4)
>        Same remark, the Notify is sent to ASP1, ASP2 and also need to 
>be sent to
>      ASP3 after the ASP Up Ack

NOTIFY is only sent upon "a change in status of a particular Application
Server".

OK, but just one more remark, in section 5.1.4, a notify AS-Inactive is
sent to 
ASP1 and ASP2 while to transition to ASP-Inactive was effective after
the first 
ASP_UP(/ACK) comming from ASP1, so notify to ASP2 should be considerer
as inopportune.

In last november, it was agreed in a thread that when an ASP was
transitionned to UP,
The current AS state was sent to this ASP, whatever could be the state.
This current 
State can be used by the management of an ASP to decide if the AS has to
be activated 
Immediately or must wait for an AS-PENDING or AS-INACTIVE notification.

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran