Subject: RE: [Sigtran] M3UA IG v04

From: Ken Morneault <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 10:27:50 -0400

Francois,

Can you send me a ptr to the email you reference.

Thanks,

Ken

At 04:20 PM 7/9/2003 +0200, Zannin, Francois wrote:
>Ken,
>
>My point of view on he question, see hereafter.
>
>Regards,
>
>Francois Z.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ken Morneault [mailto:[email-masked]] 
>Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 3:56 PM
>To: Zannin, Francois; J.Javier Pastor (EE/EEM); [email-masked]
>Subject: RE: [Sigtran] M3UA IG v04
>
>
>Francois,
>
>Pls see comments below.
>
>Regards,
>
>Ken
>
>At 10:15 AM 7/9/2003 +0200, Zannin, Francois wrote:
>>Just some comment about the M3UA IG v04
>>
>>3.21 NOTIFY messages are missing in Examples section
>>Figure (section 5.1.2)
>>        a NOTIFY(AS-INACTIVE) must be sent from SGP to ASP2 after the 
>>ASP Up Ack
>>
>>Figure (section 5.1.3)
>>        a NOTIFY(AS-INACTIVE) must be sent from SGP to ASP2 after the 
>>ASP Up Ack
>>
>>Figure (section 5.1.4)
>>        Same remark, the Notify is sent to ASP1, ASP2 and also need to 
>>be sent to
>>      ASP3 after the ASP Up Ack
>
>NOTIFY is only sent upon "a change in status of a particular Application
>Server".
>
>OK, but just one more remark, in section 5.1.4, a notify AS-Inactive is
>sent to 
>ASP1 and ASP2 while to transition to ASP-Inactive was effective after
>the first 
>ASP_UP(/ACK) comming from ASP1, so notify to ASP2 should be considerer
>as inopportune.
>
>In last november, it was agreed in a thread that when an ASP was
>transitionned to UP,
>The current AS state was sent to this ASP, whatever could be the state.
>This current 
>State can be used by the management of an ASP to decide if the AS has to
>be activated 
>Immediately or must wait for an AS-PENDING or AS-INACTIVE notification.

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran