Subject: [Sip] Revised Path draft vs the revised Service Route Discovery d raft

From: Tan Ya-Ching ICM N PG U ID A 1 <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:10:42 +0200

Hi folks,

Sorry about the confusion. I'm a bit behind on the SIP list and just read
the draft-willis-sip-path-03 and commented on it. Then I discovered the
revised service route discovery draft and thought that it was supposed to
replace the Path draft. However, it seems that the Path header draft still
stands according to the following mail. Or does it not ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext AC Mahendran [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: 22 April, 2002 19:49
> To: Dean Willis; [email-masked]
> Cc: 3GPP_TSG_CN_WG1
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Revised Service Route Discovery Draft
> 
> Also, doesn't the "Path" header provide the same functionality as the 
> "P-Service-Route" ?

In IETF SIP WG is was impossible to reach consensus on using
Path for both - originated and terminated - session cases.
Thus, the Path header will be used for terminated session
cases only, whereas the P-Service-Route header only affects
the originated session cases.

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip