Subject: RE: [Sip] Poll: interest in Reason header work

From: "Zmolek, Andrew (Andrew)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 06:15:00 -0700

I support bringing this into SIP

--Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Willis [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:39 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: [Sip] Poll: interest in Reason header work
> 
> 
> It looks like UPDATE and Manyfolks are likely to be dependent on the
> Reason header mechanism (imho). Given this (and the other requirements
> discussions that we've heard), how do you people feel about proposing
> this as a SIP WG effort? And yes, the SIP WG can identify work that
> needs to be done to support other SIP WG efforts without having a
> third-party generate a requirements RFC.
> 
> --
> Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip