Subject: RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-asserted-identity-01

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 10:24:08 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 10:30 PM
> To: Peterson, Jon
> Cc: [email-masked]'
> Subject: RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-asserted-identity-01
> 
> 
> Peterson, Jon writes:
> 
>  > The proposition that Juha put forward to which I responded 
> in my last mail -
>  > that a service provider will bill me at a lesser rate if I select a
>  > favorable area code in my calling party number - is 
> absurd: the service
>  > provider knows who you are, knows the area codes you can 
> claim in your
>  > calling party number, and it seems unlikely that they are 
> granting this
>  > flexibility so that you can elect to pay them less money.
> 
> in many cases the party that provides the sip proxy that authenticates
> the user and lets the user to selects its sip identity has nothing to
> the with the party that provides the pstn service.  the pstn service
> provider simply charges based on called and calling party numbers and
> doesn't know anything about the sip user and certainly doesn't do any
> favors for him/her.

Wouldn't that sip entity be your PSTN gateway? the gateway can authenticate the user.

Hisham

> 
> -- juha
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
> Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip