Subject: RE: [Sip] WGLC: draft-ietf-sip-acr-code

From: "Elwell, John" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 08:08:37 +0100

1. Section 1, first paragraph. Would it be beneficial to mention the
anonymity provisions of RFC 4474, i.e., a signature that says the request
originated at the domain indicated in the From header field but the specific
user is not disclosed? If so, then RFC 4474 would need to be added as an
informative reference.

2. Section 1, 2nd paragraph "that reason phrase is not useful for automata".
Add "or where the caller speaks a different language". 

3. I am not sure where it fits, but should there be mention of the HERFP
problem, i.e. 433 being masked by some other response code at a forking
proxy?

NITS:
4. Section 4, first paragraph: "if user continues" - change to "if the user
continues".

5. Section 4, second paragraph: "A UAC the does not understand" - change to
"A UAC that does not understand".

6. Section 5: "the server refused the fulfill" - change to "the server
refused to fulfill".

7. Section 7: "an request" - change to "a request".

8. Section 7, second paragraph "this has the desired effect" - change to
"anonymous call rejection has the desired effect". ("this" looks like it
refers to the fact that telemarketeers frequently withhold their identity).

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drage, Keith (Keith) [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: 04 September 2006 20:16
> To: IETF SIP List
> Subject: [Sip] WGLC: draft-ietf-sip-acr-code
> 
> (as WG chair)
> 
> This is to announce a Working Group Last Call on:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-acr-code-02.txt
> 
> Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
> 
> Please review and provide comments (along with any suggestions for
> resolution) on this document by:
> 
> 	Monday 18th September 2006.
> 	---------------------------
> 
> In addition, if you have reviewed and have no comments on this version
> of the document, that is useful information, so please indicate this
> direct to the WG chairs.
> 
> As this is one of the simplest documents the SIP WG has dealt 
> with in a
> long while, we encourage you to take the few minutes needed 
> to read this
> one, and get comments to us by the deadline.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> Keith Drage
> Lucent Technologies
> [email-masked]
> tel: +44 1793 776249
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
> Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip