Subject: RE: [Sip] loop fix

From: "Drage, Keith \(Keith\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:01:16 +0200

I agree.

It is an IMS requirement.

It is an IMS requirement because the 3GPP specifications normatively
reference RFC 3261 and the default value for the Max-Forwards header.

Perhaps 3GPP have to stop doing that!!!!!

Regards

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: 11 September 2006 18:31
> To: Pete Cordell
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [Sip] loop fix
> 
> Pete Cordell writes:
> 
>  > I think a 1 to 70 amplification of messages is  > still 
> quite significant and worth protecting against.
> 
> i agree.  where does 70 come from?  smells like yet another 
> IMS requirement :-) i have never seen even 20 "Received from" 
> headers in email messages and ip ttl is 32.
> 
> -- juha
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> [email-masked] for questions on current sip 
> Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip