Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-body-handling-01

From: Gonzalo Camarillo <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:09:34 +0300

Hi Dale,

what we have tried to do with this draft is to clarify things that were 
unclear and to specify stuff that we think it is essential (e.g., 
support for multipart). Since a certain degree of backwards 
compatibility has to be achieved, we are not free to specify whatever we 
want at this point. As you point out, maybe some pathological cases are 
not well covered, but we need to work within the constrains given by the 
current situation.

Thanks,

Gonzalo

[email-masked] wrote:
>    From: Paul Kyzivat <[email-masked]>
> 
>    Does that help?
> 
> There's no way of knowing until a clear and allegedly complete set of
> rules is enunciated.  The question is not to eliminate this one
> problem but to make it verifiable that no problems remain.
> 
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
> Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip