Subject: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc3265bis-01

From: Paul Kyzivat <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:26:04 -0400

I just got around to a careful read of 3265bis.

I only have one question about section 4.1.2.4:

If a subscriber is only interested in one resultant dialog, is it valid 
to return 481 for any NOTIFYs that arrive after the first? (That will 
permit it to drop state of the pending subscription without waiting for 
Timer N to expire.)

	Thanks,
	Paul