Subject: RE: [Sipping] Re: Service name stuff in natann draft

From: "Roy, Radhika R, ALABS" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:15:50 -0400

Andy and Dean:

If so, let us make it clear.

Dean: A great appreciation for your help using this magic word "GRUU" because it has solved an important puzzle what Andy has been trying to explain with so many emails.

Best regards,
Radhika

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf Of
Andy Spitzer
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:01 AM
To: Dean Willis
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Sipping] Re: Service name stuff in natann draft

Dean,

Yep.  But netann pre-dates GRUU.

--Andy Spitzer

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:05:49 -0500, Dean Willis 
<[email-masked]> wrote:

> Andy Spitzer wrote:
>
>> This is why we put the conference id in the user part...so that each 
>> conference mix can be assigned a unique name (user part), and calls for 
>> that "user" find the correct MS that hosts that particular mix.  Using 
>> the "normal" user@domain approach seemed like the right way to pin 
>> users (aka conference ids) to endpoints.
>
> Zork! It's a GRUU!
>
> --
> Dean

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP
��b�	��X��X��m����5��_��?�������+-�w��ȩ�)�N��+-����u�ޖ�fz{h~�^j�e�ƭ���}"RǬ����W�z{h��,r�n���y۟���z�b�{(�˫����*T��"�'�~��~��{^��h�g���r��H�