Subject: [Sipping] Re: OMA thoughts on draft-ietf-sipping-uri-list-conferencing-04.txt and "cc" and "bcc" lists.

From: Gonzalo Camarillo <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:59:58 +0200

Hi,

if somebody thinks this is controversial, we could have OMA author a new 
draft. However, if nobody opposes to what Dean suggests below, my 
proposal would be to include it in the existing draft.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

Dean Willis wrote:
> 
> OM is looking at uri-list conferencing for their push-to-talk work. .
> 
> One of their needs is to inform POC recipients of the "cc" list -- that 
> is, the set of other URIs invited to the conference. They also have a 
> need for "bcc" participants who get invited but not advertised.
> 
> This is allowed for in the message-list work 
> (draft-ietf-sipping-uri-list-message-06.txt) by having the message 
> exploder include a copy of the recipient list on outbound messages, and 
> allows for tagging each target as a "to", "cc" or "bcc" using the usual 
> email semantics.
> 
> 
> Should we:
> 
> 1) Address this in our uri-list draft before publishing it (it's past 
> WGLC).
> 
> 2) Request OMA author a draft that extends our draft.
> 
> 
> I believe we could basically paste the recipient-notification text from 
> uri-list-message into uri-list-conferencing. But this is a fairly late 
> phase to be changing the requirements.
> 
> -- 
> Dean
> 

-- 
Gonzalo Camarillo         Phone :  +358  9 299 33 71
Oy L M Ericsson Ab        Mobile:  +358 40 702 35 35
Telecom R&D               Fax   :  +358  9 299 30 52
FIN-02420 Jorvas          Email :  [email-masked]
Finland                   http://www.hut.fi/~gonzalo

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP